This is a follow up to a strategy we’ve covered previously: Accelerating Dual Momentum (ADM) from EngineeredPortfolio.com. See our first test of ADM, which includes a description of the strategy rules and our own analysis of the strategy. Here we’ve extended our test by 20 years to include a less effective era for this strategy. […]
TAA Strategies
Testing a Risk Premium Value Strategy
This is a test of a Risk Premium Value strategy (RPV) that allocates to major US asset classes based on current risk premium valuations relative to historical norms. Readers will note the similarity between RPV and other related strategies, such as CXO Advisory’s SACEVS. Backtested results from 1987 net of transaction costs follow (see backtest […]
Keller’s Resilient Asset Allocation
This is a test of the latest tactical strategy from Dr. Wouter Keller: Resilient Asset Allocation (RAA). RAA is intended to be a low turnover strategy, only shifting from a balanced risk portfolio to a defensive portfolio during the most potentially bearish of times. Backtested results from 1970 follow. Results are net of transaction costs […]
Aspect Partners’ Risk Managed Momentum
This is an independent test of Aspect Partners’ flagship tactical asset allocation strategy Risk Managed Momentum (RMM). By tactical standards, RMM is a very active, very aggressive strategy. It has done an excellent job navigating this difficult year so far. Backtested results from 1970 follow. Results are net of transaction costs (see backtest assumptions). Learn […]
Momentum Turning Points
This is a test of two recent papers: Momentum Turning Points and Breaking Bad Trends. Learn more about what we do and follow 50+ asset allocation strategies like these in near real-time. Successful trend-following strategies must balance the “speed” of the trading signal. If the signal is too slow, the strategy will not adapt quickly […]
Paul Novell’s Flagship Strategy SPY-COMP
This is a test of the flagship proprietary strategy from Paul Novell’s Investing for a Living. Paul has been kind enough to share his strategy rules to allow for independent verification of his results. SPY-COMP is like Growth-Trend Timing and a handful of other tactical strategies we track, in that it considers trends in both […]
A Quick Note on a Small Change to Meta
We had mentioned this in passing on previous posts, but never expounded upon it here on the blog. We thought it would be too boring and down in the weeds. But the emails just keep coming (we forgot our members tend to be as analytically-minded as we are), so here are the details… Meta is […]
Blending Buy & Hold with Tactical, A “Lethargic” Approach to Asset Allocation
This is a test of a new paper from Dr. Wouter Keller titled Growth-Trend Timing and 60-40 Variations: Lethargic Asset Allocation (LAA). This is primarily a buy & hold strategy that’s roughly based on the classic “Permanent Portfolio”, but it includes an element of tactical asset allocation. This blending of buy & hold with tactical […]
Beware Strategies That Fall Down on Good Data
Sources of long-term historical data are few and far between. Because it’s been generously provided for free, one of the most often used is data from Professor French (of Fama-French fame). Others include Shiller and Ibbotson. These datasets are fine for a first pass at testing out ideas, but they often don’t remotely match up […]
Testing a Yield-Based Asset Class Rotation Strategy
By reader request, this is a test of a tactical strategy from Harrison Schwartz that considers various economic yields in order to rotate among asset classes. Strategy results versus the 60/40 benchmark follow. We’ve extended Schwartz’s original test by an additional 6+ years, and accounted for transaction costs (see backtest assumptions). Learn about what we […]